Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] 10th anniversary of the annoucement of XML ..need help
- From: Tatu Saloranta <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hIUUmP52HE0bE1K7FuUn8T8544hkiBoxTVey8byvAE4V46ljfh1jGC6nG/QzWcjnojlvXzBUoKa9R3TTiM9uQN69OdCCA6OnqYZJN6YHwPwD7LxKwUfV4XCxWMT8m9oOcxWnzGEh3I7cz556i4PjvqZ7W9NFnLK/Kpm5Zqol15M= ;
- In-reply-to: <200606062025.k56KPGKc028611@edinburgh.nag.co.uk>
--- David Carlisle <email@example.com> wrote:
> > some ugly wikis use tags, for apparently no good
> > reason, along with non-tag markup -- if you want
> > cheap-o tags, just use HTML)?
> Unlike XML, SGML's concrete syntax isn't fixed, it
> isn't restricted to
> using <..> syntax for tags, or even any (explict)
> tags at all.
> I just asked google to turn up a link to sgml short
> ref maps and it
> gave me the article that Rick was talking about..
Thanks! That does explain it. And I thought I knew
SGML to some degree... but apparently not enough of
its more powerful features that allow full
re-definition of markup.
-+ Tatu +-
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around