xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win

RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win
From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:56:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <1152545678.6003.86.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Thread-index: AcakQlDFpcnXWluvSTGONNtWqcT0kgADnvLQ
Thread-topic: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win

By winning locally.

len 


From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@dyomedea.com] 

Your demonstration is probably brillant, but I still don't get the
point. My question was simpler: how can a technology win if there is no
winners and losers?

I really think we should stop this thread that is going nowhere and
won't continue to answer.

Sorry.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>

Prev by Date: FW: Extreme Markup Languages 2006 -the place to be in August for people who think about markup
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread