Lists Home |
Date Index |
> If you are pushing a technology beyond his domain, Its time to create a
> new technology (a new standard).
Completely agree. The real problem is when a technology is oversold in
media and with great facility your reach the limits. Then one waste time
and money walking backward and beggining other way.
> You can create 3D landscapes with
> HTML+CSS ( CSS suport X,Y and Z ), but If you really need 3D, its
> better to use something else. The problem is... because everybody
> already support HTML, its very interesting to try to use HTML, because
> widen support, potential users. If you use VRML, only +-40 guys around
> the world will be able to see your image.
Well, if really need 3D, then i would not need my current GoldStar 2D
display. Star Treck holograms are not ready still ;-)
> Its your solution, but I am fighting my way for XHTML-UTOPIA as
> posible. All my bank is in XHTML. It smell like the right thing, and the
> better stuff next railroads, laser canons and fliing cars, or the 1212
> Just kidding. I smell XHTML is the right thing. Sad you elimite it on
> your efforts for perfect web technology combos.
From the mozilla developers faq:
If your document mixes MathML with XHTML, you should use
application/xhtml+xml. [...] However, if you are using the usual HTML
features (no MathML) and are serving your content as text/html to other
browsers, there is no need to serve application/xhtml+xml to Mozilla. In
fact, doing so would deprive the Mozilla users of incremental display,
because incremental loading of XML documents has not been implemented yet.
Serving valid HTML 4.01 as text/html ensures the widest browser and search
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)