[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: Recognizing the contribution of the developers of XML
- From: peter murray-rust <pm286@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: xml-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,h.rzepa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:03:22 +0100
At 07:07 29/08/2006, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>peter murray-rust wrote:
>>Remember also that XML was a direct descendant of SGML. SGML was
>>typical first version system - over-ambitious and (I believe) never
>>fully implemented in a single piece of software.
>There are two optional features in SGML that were not implemented by
>the dominant parsers
>(OmniMark, SP, SGMLS) which were DATATAG and CONCUR. IIRC there were
>private systems that used them however. (E.g. TEI has CONCUR YES.)
I didn't mean to imply that there weren't good compliant
implementations of SGML :-) merely that AFAIK there was no (widely
available) system that did everything in one package. And in my
position - academic or self employed the only reasonable option was
(n)sgmls. I *was* interested in CONCUR and I didn't find it possible
to find a system on which I could develop my ideas. Perhaps that is a blessing.
>To say that SGML was never fully implemented assumes that the spec
>was written with that
>assumption.
I didn't say that :-) ... I am aware that all parts of the SGML spec
were implemented *somewhere* but that one might have to buy two
implementations to have a complete range of functionality.
>On the contrary, the provision of optional features with clear
>conformance levels
>shows otherwise. That James Clark or Sam Willmott or whoever decided
>not to implement
>a certain optional part of SGML shows it is good to have optional
>parts not enormous monolithic standards. So I am not aware of any
>part of ISO 8879 that was not implemented somewhere.
I am also keen on levels of compliance in design and am trying to
implement this in CML when possible. I think XML made a reasonably
good decision about what was optional (e.g. validating parsers).
MathML also has different levels of compliance. Are there other XML
specs which have major compliance levels?
>P.
Peter Murray-Rust
Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics
University of Cambridge,
Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]