[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
A Taxonomy of Deviance?
- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:36:54 +0200
Hi all,
there have been discussions previously here and elsewhere about such
notions as "feasibly valid". I'm working on a discussion of the ways
in which processors that know an XML grammar (be it XML Schema,
RelaxNG, etc. it doesn't matter) and use it for a specific task can
be resilient to errors in various manners and to various degrees.
I'm finding it difficult however to come up with a way of measuring
their resilience, and was wondering if anyone had come up with a
classification for grammar deviations and a metric for just how
deviant an instance (or subtree) is. Any thoughts or suggestions there?
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]