Re: [xml-dev] SGML complexity

[Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>]

Elliotte Harold wrote:
> While there's certainly a lot of value in 2.0, there are also a number 
> of questionable items. The bar for fully implementing it is just way 
> too high to interest a lot of folks. 
Except that the additional value in 2.0 for the 'usable'/useful subset 
is well worth it (IMHO).
don't bother with the unwanted/questionable value but take advantage of 
the additions



regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk