XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] (In)Validate My Assumptions on Linking.

On 9/28/06, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
> Ben Trafford wrote:
>
> >     After much thinking, reading, and reviewing, I've come to these
> > three ideas:
> >
> >     1) Stylesheet languages need some sort of way to display links from
> > generic XML. This is so we can interact with them in user agents. By
> > "stylesheet languages," I am specifically referring to XSL-FO and CSS.
> >
> >     2) Links need to be declared in generic XML,
>
> Given the point 1 which allows you to turn anything into link, why you
> then need to declare it as link on XML level (point 2). I mean if you
> have some generic XML, e.g.:
>
> <hotel moreinfo="http://example.org/dream-hotel";>
>    ...
>
> and you are able to say that this element should work as link on a
> stylesheet level, e.g.:
>
> hotel { link-type: simple;
>          link-target: attr(moreinfo);
>        }
>
> what is then point of point 2?

+1

I think adding multi-arc linking to CSS is the answer here.

Given XML + XSLT => DHTML + Javascript I can create multi arc links in
the browser.  If it was possible to do the same with XML + CSS then I
think most people would be happy - Less Javascript, more CSS.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS