[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] (In)Validate My Assumptions on Linking.
- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "'Ben Trafford'" <ben@prodigal.ca>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:43:18 -0500
Yes, Ben. That is why architectural forms were invented. If you want to do
some research into a thorough coverage of that topic, read Elliot Kimber's
contributions that summarize the Hytime standard and the work done among
members of the Hytime and DSSSL standards groups.
The work was considered too hard and too complex for the web.
len
From: Ben Trafford [mailto:ben@prodigal.ca]
As soon as we specify links via a rigid vocabulary that must
exist in the markup, we lose interoperability between different XML
applications.
I agree...which leads me back to my previous question --
does XLink cover the necessary aspects of "data about relationships"
as it stands?
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]