[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: Re: [xml-dev] Announcing a Preview of XString, an XML technology - XML as a String
- From: "William Gilreath" <wgilreath@gmail.com>
- To: "Tatu Saloranta" <cowtowncoder@yahoo.com>, will@williamgilreath.com
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:01:18 -0500
Thank-you for your comments, as I said in a previous message, I have
incorporated some of them into the web site about XString, so will not
repeat here.
Cheers, my best.
Will Gilreath
On 10/7/06, Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- William Gilreath <wgilreath@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Announcing a Preview of XString, an XML technology -
> > XML as a String.
> >
> > I've created a means to efficiently encode XML as a
> > flat string, which I
>
> What you describe sounds like textual variation of
> binary encodings that already exist, just less
> efficient, but almost as unreadable. What actual
> significant benefit would there be for using this
> technique?
>
> If one is willing to deviate from the canonical
> textual serialization, one might as well go fully
> binary, and get 50%+ size reduction (plus enough hints
> for decoder to be able to pre-allocate suitably sized
> chunks). Formats and implementations (Fast Infoset,
> Bnux, XBis, and probably many others) already exist,
> with demonstratable performance improvements (1.5x -
> 3x throughput increase, depending on what on how you
> measure)
>
> Based on example on page pointed to, XString would get
> modest 15% size reduction, and performance
> improvements (with _good_ implementations) tend to be
> linear to size reduction. So where's the beef? What
> actual great improvements and benefits would one get
> with Xstring?
>
> About the only relevant improvement I could see was
> the embeddability (which actually would be kind of
> nice)... but anything else?
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
> ps. With regards to this discussion, I actually do
> think it just might fit within list agenda -- it is an
> alternate serialization of Infoset, not so much
> changes to xml syntax, or alternative to Infoset.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]