XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] A design problem

David Carver wrote:
> LAKKAM Vinay (AXA-I) wrote:
>>
>> We have a requirement to build a rules engine which will be accessed 
>> very frequently(almost after every screen) to get a rule result. The 
>> rules engine will have about 100 rules, and when we pass the input 
>> information it will process again all the rules and returns the matched.
If the rules only require simple logic (no back-tracking, complex 
chaining, etc), and if you are just wanting to identify documents with 
certain patterns, then Schematron is the simplest thing to use.

Proprietary rules language tend to use higher-order logics or have 
domain-specific capabilities; they need advanced features to justify a 
price. Schematron just uses XPath.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS