[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: natures updates
- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- To: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:26:51 -0500
Leigh Dodds wrote:
>
> Jonathan Borden wrote:
>> In response to the TAG request I've updated http://www.rddl.org/
>> natures to deprecate the old nature URIs and suggest new URIs.
>> This is all of the form:
>> For XML Schema (the archetypical example):
>> (old nature) http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
>> (new nature) http://www.rddl.org/natures#XMLSchema
>
> The nice feature (IMO) that is lost here is "closure" over the
> resource natures.
>
> E.g that (in theory at least) a software agent could discover
> additional information about a nature by dereferencing the nature
> URI. E.g. a browser or other agent could use this mechanism to find
> a suitable list
> of plugins or services capable of using that resource.
Strong point.
Perhaps it would be easier to forget the idea that the rddl:nature
directly identifies the class of the related resource. Alternatively
the class of the related resource could be discovered by looking at
the RDDL document e.g.
Somewhere in http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema it would indicate that
"documents which conform to XML Schema validate according to ..."
I could change rddl2rdf.xsl to replace "rdf:type" with "rddl:nature"
making RDDL nature a regular 'ole property of the related resource.
I am going to compose a note to www-tag discussing this issue.
Based upon feedback so far (you, Elliotte) I am thinking that perhaps
we ought keep RDDL natures the way they have been.
Jonathan
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]