[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: natures updates
- From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@sophia.inria.fr>
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:52:30 +0100
Jonathan Borden wrote:
> After alot of useful discussion on the TAG, it has been pointed out to
> me that some of the URIs that we originally selected for RDDL natures
> don't make sense. In particular we were using namespace URIs as the
> RDDL natures of things whereas the RDDL nature of something is really a
> class or group that it belongs to.
>
> In response to the TAG request I've updated http://www.rddl.org/ natures
> to deprecate the old nature URIs and suggest new URIs. This is all of
> the form:
>
> For XML Schema (the archetypical example):
>
> (old nature) http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
>
> (new nature) http://www.rddl.org/natures#XMLSchema
I wonder why not use a more abstract level, say simply :
http://www.rddl.org/natures#Schema
which could be used for DTD, W3C XML Schema, Relax NG or other schema
What is found within will tell which one is used.
Moreover, what would happened if I put some Schematron assertions inside
a W3C XML Schema ?
This is the same with catalogs :
http://www.rddl.org/natures#Catalog
would suit to SGML catalogs, OASIS catalogs, and others
IMHO, it is more close to the idea that a resource belongs to a class or
group.
I noticed in RDDL some assertions that are very discutable :
http://www.rddl.org/purposes/
Section "Schema related purposes / Validation"
-I could validate a document with a DTD after parsing it, even if the
document doesn't refer to it (example : because I need to perform
XInclusion before the validation)
-Schema validation can be also combined with the parse phase.
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]