[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] XML Name and Address Structure [NAD]
- From: "Andrew S. Townley" <ast@atownley.org>
- To: sggould@oic.org
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:33:02 +0000
What about xAL (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ciq/ciq.html#6)?
If I recall correctly, it was designed to be fairly comprehensive and
cover a variety of address needs. You could always profile that if you
only needed a subset.
ast
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 18:14, Stephen GOULD wrote:
> Hi - has anyone have any comments on the UN/CEFACT Name
> and Address Structure that I could pass on to these groups ?
>
> This group of IT Experts have been reviewing whether the two XML
> address formats in the Australian eCommerce Standard AS 4590
> can be simplified to one format only.
>
> it appears that UN/EDIFACT also has two EDI Structures in the
> Address Format.
>
> Can this also be simplified to a single Address format ?
>
> Regards
>
> Stephen GOULD
>
> 11:22 Wed 13 Dec 2006 REF:ZXSARCF1
> Y/R: AS 4590
> TO: IT Expert eReview Committee cc UN/CEFACT
> Name & Address Structure Standards Australia
> AUS ECOMMERCE STANDARDS Interested Parties
>
> Hi - Thank you for taking the time to review the current AS 4590
> Structure and submitting your responses.
>
> ALL the responses received confirm that the simplex version for the
> Name and Address format of AS 4590 can be replaced by the
> Complex Version !
>
> Not only that Joost confirmed that a structured format is required
> for effective data mining - two responses placed on home page
> http://www.oic.org
>
> REVIEW UN/CEFACT - POSSIBLE UN/CEFACT SUPPORT
>
> In addition we have reviewed the UN/CEFACT eTrade documents
> stipulated in the Port of Melbourne EOI 13110 and provided
> a comparison for your consideration
> http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/
>
> As the Mission Statement of UN/CEFACT sates that it "supports
> activities dedicated to improving ebusiness activities" this review by
> you may be of considerable importance to UN/CEFACT hence
> the copy to Duane NICKULL.
>
> UN/CEFACT may want to support this initiative as:
>
> 1 Standards Australia has not been able to reconvene IS/11,
>
> 2 Tradegate has shut down ebXML Australia and
>
> 3 The Federal Government "retired" the Australian Panel of eCommerce
> Experts
> http://www.ecommerce.treasury.gov.au/html/expert.htm
>
> NEXT STEPS
>
> B FRI 15 DEC - BY 17:00
>
> 1 review new format again as draft AS 4590 address segment
>
> 2 If still agree Complex version can replace simplex version
>
> Please send e-mail
>
> 3 "I have reviewed proposed AS 4590 single XML Address
> and still consider it as the best option as an eCommerce
> Standard"
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards
>
> Stephen GOULD
> Chair
> XLM & eCommerce Special Interest Group
> OPEN INTERCHANGE CONSORTIUM
>
> E: sggould@oic.org
> M: 0416-009-468
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
--
Andrew S. Townley <ast@atownley.org>
http://atownley.org
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]