[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] a namespace definitions related question(s)
- From: richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT)
In article <B546C312A37C12438A22154026CDC7E011530737@exchfive.olympus.f5net.com> you write:
>> > In the XML instance that I posted:
>> > * is the document well formed?
>If the XML processor that processes the XML document that I gave as
>example is also validating and is namespace aware what is the correct
>answer?
Namespace and schema processing can't make a not-well-formed document
well-formed. It has to be well-formed XML before you do either of
those things.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]