XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Webelo 2.0: The Mythed and Mythstery (WAS RE: [xml-dev] YouTube videos re: documents and XML)

On 2/20/07, Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> >From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com]
>
> >Have you seen this one on XML and Web 2.0 yet?  Be sure to have the
> >sound on for the music.
>
> >   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
>
> Text is unilinear.
>
> o  Information is situated.
>
> Form is separated from content
>
> o  Formless content is more complex than situated content.
>
> HTML is complicated code.
>
> o  CSS + XML is more complicated code.  CSS + XML + XQuery + SQL is more
> complicated than that.
>
> XML was invented to separate form from content.
>
> o  XML was invented to prove SGML + HyTime + DSSSL was bad.
>
> XML facilitates automated data exchange
>
> o  XML feeds complicated syntax to complicated code written in dumbed down
> C.
>
> XML allows people to upload text without writing complicated code
>
> o  if they use less powerful unilinear text entry applications written in
> complicated code.
>

Well.  To me, the topic of the video was "Handwritten text" vs "Digital text".

There Digital text win because suport links and is easy morphing
powers. Text is a good vehicle for ideas, so better text is important.



> o  Video too:  if they learn to manage a firewall.
>
> o  Writing to a blog only requires you to type in unilinear text.
>
> o  Each time we forge a link, we state an opinion.
>
> o  Each time a link asserts a false relationship, we publish superstition.
>
> o  Web 2.0 is linking opinions into mass superstitions that are retarding
> the planet.


PHPBB alike forums are voice tradition. Camp fires for hunter tales.
This is like 100.000 years old, so will not go away soon :D

Yea, voice tradition is often inaccurate..  and retard.

People lean that way. A book is not enough, need other guy voice (the
teacher) even if the teacher make mistakes, seems a better way. Maybe
because information generated by the teacher (or the guy on the Web
2.0 forum) is customized for the receiver, removing redundant data,
adding related info, personal experience, etc.


I am amazed by the Wonders of our culture. Our democracy civilization
heritage is not a enormeous wall to stop barbarian invasions but the
wikipedia.  I am proud of our civilization :D
Happy to share this world with people that can break the berlin wall
and build the wiki :D

This list has experts, very good experts. So is a aristocracy, a
meritocracy aristocracy. Can be dificult to like something the mass
create If you are a expert, but take my word here: is a amazing cool
achievement.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS