No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
To: "'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@cisco.com>, "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:45:46 -0600

http://news.com.com/Cisco+spends+135+million+on+XML+firm/2100-1036_3-6160998
.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc

If XML has such a negligible impact on performance, why do companies like
Cisco and IBM buy small companies that build XML hardware accelerators?

I accept that one wants to find out what the bottlenecks are, but I can't
accept that companies this big spending this much money haven't.

len

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  - From: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>
- RE: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
  - From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>

References:
- better (?) than DOM
  - From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@cisco.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]