XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware

On Feb 22, 2007, at 19:35, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Indeed these beliefs may not be unrelated. Both binary and hardware  
> solutions have the common distinction of being more opaque than  
> their competitors. Perhaps it is their very opaqueness that makes  
> them attractive.

In the interest of fairness, I've spoken to a great many proponents  
of efficient XML and interested parties, and I've only very rarely  
seen that argument come up other than as a joke. What I have seen far  
more often is people who don't see what is fundamentally less opaque  
about a text-based format (and if they're in the Web Services  
business, can we really blame them?).

Never ascribe to malice yadda yadda.

--
Robin Berjon
........................................................................
Leela:  I might have liked Zapp Brannigan if he weren't a pompous
   dimwit who threw me in prison.
Bender: You really are too picky.
                         -- Futurama




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS