[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL documents
- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:31:24 -0500
OASIS has been using RDDL 2.0 for namespace documents [4].
W3C has been using RDDL 1.0 for namespace documents [5].
WADL also has a RDDL 1.0 namespace document. [5]
[4] and [5] are bookmarks of these examples.
[4] http://del.icio.us/mitrepauld/xmlns+rddl+2.0
[5] http://del.icio.us/mitrepauld/xmlns+rddl+1.0
I had proposed [6] using RDDL as a UDDI "taxonomy
document" where the overviewURL of a UDDI tModel
points to a RDDL document, which can then point
to various artifacts associated with the
taxonomy. For example, if there is an OWL
representation of the taxonomy, the RDDL document
could point to it with an appropriate
rddl:nature, or use a different rddl:nature to
point to a different representation (e.g., one
that can be imported into a Systinet UDDI
registry). My hope was that tools that deal with
taxonomies could discover taxonomies registered
in UDDI, then retrieve the RDDL, then retrieve
the representation that the tool could import to
work with the taxonomy locally. I have been
frustrated with the slow response time of some
UDDI deployments that have round trips to the
server every time I drill down a level of a
taxonomy. Having a local copy of all or part of
a taxonomy would hopefully provide better
response time and improve the usability of the
taxonomy. You probably won't find this idea for
RDDL "being used in the wild" currently.
[6] http://del.icio.us/mitrepauld/rddl+uddi
Paul
At 11:22 AM 2007-02-20, Norman Walsh wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to reach closure on the TAG namespaceDocument-8 issue.
>I thought we were pretty close[1]. But when we talked about it at
>the last f2f[2], things went in ... a different direction[3].
>
>In an effort to pull things back into something that resembles shape,
>I offered to try to find out how RDDL is actually being used "in the
>wild".
>
>I know there are some RDDL documents at www.w3.org, but there must be
>others.
>
>Pointers to RDDL-in-the-wild most appreciated. I'd also be interested
>in descriptions of code that uses such RDDL documents.
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/12/13-morning-minutes#item02
>[3] http://norman.walsh.name/2006/12/18/rddl
>
>
>--
>Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There exist some evils so terrible and
>http://nwalsh.com/ | some misfortunes so horrible that we
> | dare not think of them, whilst their
> | very aspect makes us shudder; but if
> | they happen to fall on us, we find
> | ourselves stronger than we imagined; we
> | grapple with our ill luck, and behave
> | better than we expected we should.--La
> | Bruyère
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]