XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema question re: duplicate element definitionswhen using elementFormDefault="qualified"


In your case, the elements are locally scoped, yes. It has nothing to do 
with elementFormDefault. They are local elements because they are 
specified using the name attribute, not references (to a global element 
with that name.) The fact that they are specified using a direct type 
rather than a type reference also does not change that they are locally 
scoped.

What the elementFormDefault has to do with is which namespace these 
elements are in. You can have a local element and a global element with 
different type definitions both of which have the same element name and 
namespace.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> Is this valid?
>
> <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>   targetNamespace="urn:example:duplicateElements"
>   elementFormDefault="qualified">
>  <complexType name="foo">
>    <sequence>
>      <element name="foobar" type="string"/>
>    </sequence>
>  </complexType>
>  <complexType name="bar">
>    <sequence>
>      <element name="foobar" type="string"/>
>    </sequence>
>  </complexType>
> </schema>
>
> Note two elements named "foobar".
>
> XML Schema spec [1] says:
>
> "Locally scoped attribute and element declarations are special with
> regard to symbol spaces. Every complex type definition defines its own
> local attribute and element declaration symbol spaces, where these
> symbol spaces are distinct from each other and from any of the other
> symbol spaces. So, for example, two complex type definitions having the
> same target namespace can contain a local attribute declaration for the
> unqualified name "priority", or contain a local element declaration for
> the name "address", without conflict or necessary relation between the 
> two."
>
> But given that the schema specifies elementFormDefault="qualified",
> are the "foobar" elements locally scoped?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#concepts-nameSymbolSpaces
>
> Thanks,
> Anne
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS