XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] XML dictionary - second try

Michael Kay wrote:
>> This looks like what I need, but it is quite complicated... I 
>> was expected something simpler.
>>
>>     
>
> Generic schemas are always more complicated than you expect. That's because
> your requirements are a subset of the requirements of the community as a
> whole, often quite a small subset. A published generic schema will tend to
> be the union of everyone's requirements.
>   
    In that case it might be better to develop my own "quick" version. I 
will have to explain a small set of rules to the partner sites, 
otherwise I need to explain this generic specification which is much 
more complex.

    I am thinking what is the best trade-off.


Regards,
Razvan N.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS