|
Hello, One addition to this: if I have no XML
Schema does this mean that the ``a’’ column is meaningless? For example If I have no schema, is the following OK,
with regards to namespaces, or not? <a> <b/> <b xmlns=”foo”/> </a> <a> and the first <b> are not
qualified, and the second <b> is qualified. Does this make sense? I mean, if there’s
no schema, does it means that every name is unqualified unless it is qualified
explicitly qualified? (this sorts of sounds like a tautology…) Shlomo. From: Shlomo Yona
[mailto:S.Yona@f5.com] Hello, I am trying to understand the impact of schema hints and
evidence from XML documents on the proper handling of namespaces. Here is what
I came up with a. Name is qualified in XML Schema: yes/no b. Name is prefixed in XML document: yes/no (default
namespace is also considered as a prefix, the empty string prefix, for this
discussion’s sake) c. Prefix for name is defined in XML document: yes/no There are 8 possibilities for the above criterions. An error should be issued (not necessarily same error in all
cases) in all cases except for the following three: a==b==c==0 a==1 b==0 c==1 a==1 b==1 c==1 My question is, are these indeed all possibilities? Are
there other factors that need to be considered? Is my understanding correct? Thanks. Shlomo. |