[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database
- From: "Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev)" <abcoatesecure-xmldev@yahoo.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:10:51 +0100
The so-called "rule 0" of relational databases *is* that all information
has to be available in relational form, i.e. in queriable form.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codd's_12_rules
Cheers, Tony.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:19:25 +0100, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>> In a relational database, a standard query
>> allows to retreive data, but does not allow to investigate
>> the design of the database
>
> Not true. The SQL standard defines a standard set of tables that hold
> metadata, ie. information about tables and columns. At any rate, it did
> so
> about 20 years ago which was the last time I looked.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
--
Anthony B. Coates
Senior Partner
Miley Watts LLP
Experts In Data
UK: +44 (20) 8816 7700, US: +1 (239) 344 7700
Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026
Data standards participant: genericode, ISO 20022 (ISO 15022 XML),
UN/CEFACT, MDDL, FpML, UBL.
http://www.mileywatts.com/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]