[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] OOXML: So what *should* happen now?
- From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
- To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:19:00 -0700
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> OOXML didn't make it in the first round balloting for fast track
> acceptance. What should happen now?
Here are some outcomes that I think would be good:
1. The parts of ODF & OOXML that are identical, e.g. "A left-
justified ragged-right paragraph, foreground #0a0000 background
#ffffff, Georgia 11pt, 1.2leading, no widow/orphan control" are
merged. The world does *not* need two ways to express this. It
doesn't really matter that much which XML vocabulary is used for this
purpose. Then there's a separate specification for all the extra
stuff that Office does but ODF doesn't cover.
2. OOXML, maybe with some cleanup, is published in a public, stable
location in a stable format, with a public, formal commitment from
Microsoft that they will support this as specified in future releases
of the Office product suite and won't litigate against anyone who
writes software either to read or to generate this format for any
purpose whatsoever.
The task of addressing all ten thousand or so ISO-member comments,
even after removing dupes, and dealing with the callouts to
unspecified product behavior, and so on, with no assurance that doing
so would result in ISO blessing, seems just insanely expensive and
difficult to me. If those guys take it on, they have my respect and
sympathy. -T
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]