XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] OOXML: So what *should* happen now?

> The task of addressing all ten thousand or so ISO-member 
> comments, even after removing dupes, and dealing with the 
> callouts to unspecified product behavior, and so on, with no 
> assurance that doing so would result in ISO blessing, seems 
> just insanely expensive and difficult to me.

Actually, 10,000 comments on a 6,000 page spec doesn't sound like a large
number to me. If I had less than two comments per page on a book or spec I
had submitted for technical review, I would be concerned that the review
wasn't thorough enough. Perhaps people were holding back because they don't
want to provide MS with a free QA service.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS