XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Heterogeneous XML editing environments - how do youcope?

Robert Koberg wrote:
> This isn't XML. ???
>
> If you are writing source code documentation then thre are ways to set
> preserve space.
>   
Quite so - sorry, my original response was misguided.

Back to your original statement, though...

> Is whitespace like this important:
> > >
> > > <p>blah blah
> > > blah blah blah
> > > blah blah</p>
> > >
> > > ? Doesn't it seem incorrect? But it's probably nice for the vi/emacs
> > > user. But why use stone tablets?
>   

Well, you seem to be saying that a GUI-oriented XML tool should feel 
free to output things that are hard to format for those who use tools 
like Emacs, and that everyone should use the GUI-oriented tool?

When you have a heterogeneous editing environment, that's because 
different tools are better for different jobs. Certainly the vast 
majority of XML luminaries I know use text oriented editors with XML 
extensions rather than GUI tools like XMetaL. So I was glad to see 
Liam's post that suggests that this behavior can be modified.

Jonathan


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS