[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Heterogeneous XML editing environments - how do youcope?
- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
- To: rob@koberg.com
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:51:05 -0400
Robert Koberg wrote:
> This isn't XML. ???
>
> If you are writing source code documentation then thre are ways to set
> preserve space.
>
Quite so - sorry, my original response was misguided.
Back to your original statement, though...
> Is whitespace like this important:
> > >
> > > <p>blah blah
> > > blah blah blah
> > > blah blah</p>
> > >
> > > ? Doesn't it seem incorrect? But it's probably nice for the vi/emacs
> > > user. But why use stone tablets?
>
Well, you seem to be saying that a GUI-oriented XML tool should feel
free to output things that are hard to format for those who use tools
like Emacs, and that everyone should use the GUI-oriented tool?
When you have a heterogeneous editing environment, that's because
different tools are better for different jobs. Certainly the vast
majority of XML luminaries I know use text oriented editors with XML
extensions rather than GUI tools like XMetaL. So I was glad to see
Liam's post that suggests that this behavior can be modified.
Jonathan
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]