[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Will the next version of XML Schema have a schema-for-schemas that is standalone (no English prose needed to describe constraints in the language)?
- From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:55:57 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Kay writes:
> I wasn't there either, but I always thought that they took DTDs as the
> starting point, and then added capabilities corresponding to the main ways
> in which parameter entities were believed to be used to achieve
> customization and reuse.
I _was_ there, and that's a good summary. I'd add two more points:
introducing the tag/type distinction and removing the most egregious
differences between attribute and element type declarations.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHHHOtkjnJixAXWBoRAtoKAJ4oXGCf2W8Akg77+CAM0+6lLWY0VACfSwf7
usfagG+tD2fPgrMEPSYTQSY=
=89up
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]