XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange

I'll put in that Schematron is useful for specifying more than just
co-constraints when one is talking about compatibility, it could be
used as technical documentation as to compatibility axis of various
elements.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen
On Dec 30, 2007 3:30 AM, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> wrote:
> Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> > I think that for a client to be able to utilize a web service, the web
> > service must specify three things:
> >
> > (1) Syntax of the data that the web service makes available to clients;
> > use a grammar-based language such as XML Schemas, or RELAX NG, or DTD.
> >
> >
>
> Ok.
>
>
> > (2) Relationship constraints (e.g. co-constraints) on the data; use
> > Schematron.
> >
> >
>
> Seems a bit arbitrary.   Why "relationship constraints" of that
> particular form?
> What's your theory, here?   Your claim wasn't that Schematron can be useful
> but that "[in order] for a client to be able to utilize a web service
> [....]" which is
> a remarkably strong claim.
>
>
>
>
> > (3) Semantics of the data; use a data dictionary, or English prose, or
> > RDF/S, or OWL, some combination thereof.
> >
> >
>
> Again, what's your theory?   Some notation that usefully indicates semantics
> seems a good idea, I grant you.   Obviously, also, service has to be
> documented somewhere.
> How did you get from there to "English prose, RDF/S, or OWL, some
> combination thereof"?
>
>
> (2) and (3) suggest investments, presumably with some return.   They
> also suggest
> suggestions competitive with a lot of well developed theory in program
> typing and
> in modeling the semantics of programs.   So, why are the technologies
> and approaches
> you suggest the right choice here?
>
> -t
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS