[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:45:23 +0100
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
>>
>> In 2002, I proposed XML-SW (http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html)
>> which retains namespaces but discards DTD's (thus entities and
>> notations and so on) and the <!DOCTYPE>, also rolling in the
>> Information Set and xml:base. I still think it's a good idea.
> +1 (except I'd like for all the W3C and math special character entities
> to be built-in: too many people like them and XHTML uses them)
+1
(And entities are not used only by XHTML but also by DocBook and MathML,
for example.)
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenPGP digital signature
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]