543 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
| Thread Index
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 29 Feb 2008 20:33:55 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 29 Feb 2008 20:09:11 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 19:31:33 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 19:28:59 -0000
- Schema for unordered elements, with additional requirements
- From "Robert Hall" <rhall@tivo.com> on 29 Feb 2008 18:51:58 -0000
- OASIS XACML InterOp Demo, RSA 2008, San Francisco, California, USA, April 7-11 2008
- From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org> on 29 Feb 2008 18:14:14 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 16:46:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 29 Feb 2008 16:28:44 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 15:04:30 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 29 Feb 2008 14:54:15 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 12:57:17 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Feb 2008 11:32:47 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 29 Feb 2008 10:22:21 -0000
- Press Release - CECID Contributed Self-Service Hermes Messaging Gatewayv2.0 (H2O) Testing Server for Free
- From Patrick Yee <kcyee@cecid.hku.hk> on 29 Feb 2008 09:35:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents
- From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 29 Feb 2008 09:01:31 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 28 Feb 2008 22:07:04 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2008 21:33:17 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 28 Feb 2008 21:33:15 -0000
- Email Validation with Regular Expression
- From "Benjamin Azan" <ben.azan@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2008 19:37:37 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?
- From dave <ceek63@yahoo.com> on 28 Feb 2008 19:01:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2008 15:02:01 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2008 15:01:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 28 Feb 2008 14:47:36 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 28 Feb 2008 14:38:59 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 28 Feb 2008 13:38:00 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2008 10:37:28 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2008 09:18:22 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Feb 2008 08:37:58 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 28 Feb 2008 02:33:34 -0000
- xs:string - Isn't whitespaces preserved by default?
- From dave <ceek63@yahoo.com> on 28 Feb 2008 00:57:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model..
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 22:23:59 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2008 21:44:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model..
- From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 21:35:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] persisting java object model..
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 20:29:52 -0000
- persisting java object model..
- From dave <ceek63@yahoo.com> on 27 Feb 2008 19:55:59 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2008 19:52:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Johnson, Matthew C. (LNG-ALB)" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com> on 27 Feb 2008 19:32:05 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2008 18:41:14 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2008 18:22:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2008 18:09:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 27 Feb 2008 17:56:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 27 Feb 2008 17:41:26 -0000
- XPath 2.0 data-model - dm:string-value of a node
- From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F5.com> on 27 Feb 2008 17:05:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 27 Feb 2008 14:55:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration?
- From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 27 Feb 2008 14:14:46 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2008 14:06:49 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2008 13:42:15 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration?
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 12:28:56 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Accept-Charset and XML declaration?
- From "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F5.com> on 27 Feb 2008 12:22:42 -0000
- Accept-Charset and XML declaration?
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 11:18:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 09:41:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 27 Feb 2008 09:38:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Feb 2008 09:15:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 08:24:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2008 06:37:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 27 Feb 2008 01:29:37 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 27 Feb 2008 00:38:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 26 Feb 2008 22:55:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2008 22:14:14 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2008 21:56:01 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2008 21:19:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com> on 26 Feb 2008 19:47:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2008 19:34:44 -0000
- RE: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com> on 26 Feb 2008 17:11:04 -0000
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 26 Feb 2008 17:07:50 -0000
- Resolving XML's Unicode Incompatibility Problem Using"Positional Tagging"
- From Stephen Beller <sbeller@nhds.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:59:25 -0000
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:41:48 -0000
- RE: [SPAM] Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments'
- From "Moberg Dale" <dmoberg@axway.com> on 26 Feb 2008 16:27:34 -0000
- IDtrust 2008 Program Complete--Last Chance to Register!!
- From "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org> on 26 Feb 2008 15:36:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2008 14:20:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 26 Feb 2008 13:09:47 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2008 11:56:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Nested Documents
- From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 26 Feb 2008 07:32:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2008 01:43:13 -0000
- [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2008 01:43:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "\"John L. Clark\"" <jlc6@po.cwru.edu> on 26 Feb 2008 01:32:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "\"John L. Clark\"" <jlc6@po.cwru.edu> on 26 Feb 2008 01:30:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams
- From Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca> on 25 Feb 2008 18:53:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Optimizing XML performance
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 17:55:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel BitStreams
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 25 Feb 2008 17:25:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 15:51:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 15:41:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:55:56 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:54:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:51:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:48:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Eric Bréchemier" <eric.brechemier@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:26:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:12:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:06:47 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Stephen Beller <sbeller@nhds.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:03:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Feb 2008 14:02:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 25 Feb 2008 13:53:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Feb 2008 13:38:49 -0000
- XML parsing @ 100MB-1000MB/sec/GHz with Parallel Bit Streams
- From Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca> on 25 Feb 2008 12:57:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 11:10:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 25 Feb 2008 10:45:34 -0000
- Re[6]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 25 Feb 2008 08:55:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 25 Feb 2008 08:00:08 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Feb 2008 23:59:56 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Feb 2008 23:57:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 24 Feb 2008 23:05:58 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 24 Feb 2008 20:50:17 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Feb 2008 19:31:19 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Feb 2008 19:10:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 24 Feb 2008 18:49:47 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 24 Feb 2008 18:43:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 24 Feb 2008 17:10:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names
- From David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com> on 24 Feb 2008 15:12:24 -0000
- Optimizing XML performance
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 24 Feb 2008 14:46:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@googlemail.com> on 24 Feb 2008 09:48:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From 'Liam Quin' <liam@w3.org> on 24 Feb 2008 00:35:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2008 23:48:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 23 Feb 2008 18:45:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 23 Feb 2008 17:54:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Jim Ancona <jim@anconafamily.com> on 23 Feb 2008 16:57:23 -0000
- Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Stephen-NHDS <sbeller@nhds.com> on 23 Feb 2008 16:40:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 23 Feb 2008 15:43:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 23 Feb 2008 14:54:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 23 Feb 2008 14:02:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 23 Feb 2008 11:05:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 23 Feb 2008 10:17:59 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Feb 2008 10:05:28 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Feb 2008 09:50:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 23 Feb 2008 08:36:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Jim Ancona <jim@anconafamily.com> on 23 Feb 2008 06:15:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 23 Feb 2008 05:30:44 -0000
- Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2008 04:52:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 23 Feb 2008 04:36:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2008 03:30:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Anne Thomas Manes" <atmanes@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2008 01:35:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RESTful operations on document fragments
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 22 Feb 2008 22:52:11 -0000
- RESTful operations on document fragments
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Feb 2008 22:32:46 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org> on 22 Feb 2008 21:27:18 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Working with Unicode files (was Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@springer.com> on 22 Feb 2008 18:31:30 -0000
- Working with Unicode files (was Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com> on 22 Feb 2008 18:16:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:24:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 22 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Waters, Michael, Springer US" <Mike.Waters@springer.com> on 22 Feb 2008 16:54:47 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org> on 22 Feb 2008 16:45:38 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 22 Feb 2008 14:11:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2008 12:27:08 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2008 12:03:30 -0000
- [offtopic] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 22 Feb 2008 10:59:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 22 Feb 2008 10:53:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2008 10:29:34 -0000
- RE: Re[4]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2008 10:14:50 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2008 10:01:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2008 09:42:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2008 07:12:50 -0000
- Re[4]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 22 Feb 2008 07:11:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 22 Feb 2008 06:33:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org> on 22 Feb 2008 05:59:24 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Feb 2008 00:11:48 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 21 Feb 2008 23:36:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> on 21 Feb 2008 23:33:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com> on 21 Feb 2008 21:41:22 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 20:32:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 21 Feb 2008 20:14:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 20:03:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 20:02:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 19:57:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 19:52:26 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 19:46:43 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 19:14:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 21 Feb 2008 18:03:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 17:43:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 17:37:19 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2008 16:25:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 21 Feb 2008 16:04:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:39:51 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 15:17:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2008 14:16:16 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was:CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 21 Feb 2008 13:27:32 -0000
- file with rules instead of tag's prefix
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 21 Feb 2008 12:42:38 -0000
- [main] Namespace: file with rules instead of tag's prefix (was: Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)}
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 21 Feb 2008 11:45:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] xml:type (Was: Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?)
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 11:41:49 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 10:57:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 10:09:06 -0000
- xml:type (Was: Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?)
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 21 Feb 2008 09:48:47 -0000
- Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 21 Feb 2008 07:57:28 -0000
- Re[2]: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 21 Feb 2008 07:17:39 -0000
- [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 21 Feb 2008 07:17:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 21 Feb 2008 04:46:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2008 04:38:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From David Carver <d_a_carver@yahoo.com> on 21 Feb 2008 03:35:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 21 Feb 2008 03:02:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> on 21 Feb 2008 01:38:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> on 20 Feb 2008 23:28:23 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 20 Feb 2008 18:59:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0
- From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 20 Feb 2008 18:55:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Feb 2008 18:30:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 20 Feb 2008 17:37:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2008 17:08:43 -0000
- XML 2.0
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Feb 2008 17:07:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 20 Feb 2008 16:40:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 16:04:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 16:01:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:57:06 -0000
- [2] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 15:49:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:45:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:44:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:33:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Robin Berjon <robin@joost.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:31:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2008 15:15:35 -0000
- Re: Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was:CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 20 Feb 2008 14:51:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2008 14:33:00 -0000
- [3] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 14:30:47 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 20 Feb 2008 14:19:31 -0000
- Re[2]: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 14:08:58 -0000
- Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 14:08:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSSinstead of Namespace)
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 20 Feb 2008 13:52:37 -0000
- Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 13:42:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2008 13:14:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 20 Feb 2008 10:52:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] CSS instead of Namespace
- From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 20 Feb 2008 09:26:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 20 Feb 2008 08:54:16 -0000
- CSS instead of Namespace
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 20 Feb 2008 07:47:10 -0000
- [xml-dev] javascript to acces xsl:sort
- From "S.Kannan" <techy_kans@yahoo.co.in> on 20 Feb 2008 06:56:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 20 Feb 2008 04:02:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 20 Feb 2008 03:28:52 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 20 Feb 2008 02:10:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Feb 2008 22:59:11 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 19 Feb 2008 22:15:27 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 19 Feb 2008 22:10:12 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 19 Feb 2008 19:59:20 -0000
- [xml-dev] XML Grammar [EBNF]
- From "netbeans.javame.user" <netbeans.javame.user@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2008 19:56:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2008 19:31:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2008 19:22:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2008 16:00:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2008 10:21:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 19 Feb 2008 09:09:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 19 Feb 2008 04:05:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2008 03:48:35 -0000
- Re: XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2008 03:43:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 19 Feb 2008 01:02:07 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Feb 2008 23:25:50 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Feb 2008 22:52:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> on 18 Feb 2008 22:51:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Pete Kirkham" <mach.elf@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 20:33:49 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 18 Feb 2008 20:10:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 20:04:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:38:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 19:37:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 18 Feb 2008 19:30:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 19:27:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 18 Feb 2008 19:25:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:19:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:13:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:09:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:04:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 19:00:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 19:00:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 18:56:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 18:18:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 18:00:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:48:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:40:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:36:32 -0000
- XML element names (was: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?)
- From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@openfinance.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:33:43 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:31:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 17:28:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 17:25:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:24:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:23:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> on 18 Feb 2008 17:16:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 18 Feb 2008 17:13:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Kevin S. Clarke" <ksclarke@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 17:05:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 17:03:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:59:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:56:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com> on 18 Feb 2008 16:55:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:51:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 16:49:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:44:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:40:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:36:44 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@hotmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 16:36:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 18 Feb 2008 16:35:47 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Kevin S. Clarke" <ksclarke@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 16:26:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 16:09:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 15:55:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 15:30:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 14:59:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@openfinance.com> on 18 Feb 2008 14:57:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 14:55:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 18 Feb 2008 14:09:00 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Feb 2008 12:21:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML
- From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 18 Feb 2008 12:08:15 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Several external entities in an XML
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Feb 2008 11:43:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 11:25:10 -0000
- Several external entities in an XML
- From "Jonathan Ceballos Rodriguez" <jceballosrodriguez@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2008 11:00:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Nicholas Sushkin <nsushkin@openfinance.com> on 18 Feb 2008 05:13:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu> on 18 Feb 2008 03:03:45 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 18 Feb 2008 00:42:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 17 Feb 2008 16:28:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 17 Feb 2008 11:00:56 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Feb 2008 00:19:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 21:46:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- Recursive Processing
- From mike@adatinc.com on 16 Feb 2008 19:57:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 16 Feb 2008 18:48:50 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Feb 2008 18:15:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 17:30:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 16 Feb 2008 15:30:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 14:09:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2008 13:24:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org> on 16 Feb 2008 09:13:08 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Feb 2008 08:50:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Feb 2008 03:57:30 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 16 Feb 2008 03:35:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 03:00:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 02:52:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 16 Feb 2008 02:48:20 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Feb 2008 22:53:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From mike@adatinc.com on 15 Feb 2008 21:28:48 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 15 Feb 2008 20:21:05 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 15 Feb 2008 18:44:00 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Feb 2008 18:25:57 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@xopus.com> on 15 Feb 2008 17:29:47 -0000
- RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@xopus.com> on 15 Feb 2008 17:27:17 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 15 Feb 2008 17:10:33 -0000
- Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 15 Feb 2008 16:06:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 15 Feb 2008 15:47:40 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 15 Feb 2008 12:06:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 15 Feb 2008 12:04:20 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 15 Feb 2008 11:54:07 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 15 Feb 2008 11:08:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 15 Feb 2008 10:44:00 -0000
- [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 15 Feb 2008 10:29:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 15 Feb 2008 09:35:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 15 Feb 2008 05:48:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM> on 15 Feb 2008 00:30:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Philip Fearon" <pgfearo@googlemail.com> on 14 Feb 2008 22:55:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 14 Feb 2008 17:35:56 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 14 Feb 2008 07:20:34 -0000
- ANN: Best Practices for XML Internationalization
- From Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> on 14 Feb 2008 05:53:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 14 Feb 2008 02:26:12 -0000
- W3C XML is Ten Years Old
- From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 14 Feb 2008 00:50:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From mike@adatinc.com on 13 Feb 2008 20:20:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From mike@adatinc.com on 13 Feb 2008 19:37:22 -0000
- [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 13 Feb 2008 14:40:01 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Feb 2008 10:19:02 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Feb 2008 10:12:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 13 Feb 2008 09:42:33 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:44 -0000
- [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:41 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:33 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 13 Feb 2008 09:03:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 23:34:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announcesMicrosoft commitment to declarative programming
- From Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> on 12 Feb 2008 21:39:26 -0000
- Synchronicity or pseudonym? Bill Gates announces Microsoft commitment to declarative programming
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 20:50:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 19:31:54 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 18:44:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Feb 2008 18:12:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 12 Feb 2008 18:06:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:55:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:43:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:40:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:28:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 17:25:44 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:10:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 17:04:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 17:01:22 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Feb 2008 16:53:08 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2008 16:47:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 12 Feb 2008 16:36:44 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 12 Feb 2008 16:33:29 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@hotmail.com> on 12 Feb 2008 15:54:54 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 15:41:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 12 Feb 2008 15:22:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 14:52:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 12 Feb 2008 14:43:55 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 13:51:43 -0000
- [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 13:51:30 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@hotmail.com> on 12 Feb 2008 13:49:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 12 Feb 2008 13:27:03 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:56:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:56:40 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:32:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 12 Feb 2008 12:13:53 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 11:32:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 12 Feb 2008 11:27:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 12 Feb 2008 11:19:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 11:07:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 12 Feb 2008 10:49:36 -0000
- Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:50 -0000
- Re: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:47 -0000
- Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:46 -0000
- Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:46 -0000
- Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:45 -0000
- Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 12 Feb 2008 10:27:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 12 Feb 2008 10:12:46 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 10:10:06 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2008 10:03:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From mike@adatinc.com on 12 Feb 2008 09:10:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 12 Feb 2008 07:28:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Feb 2008 03:20:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 03:12:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Feb 2008 03:07:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 02:16:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 12 Feb 2008 02:13:58 -0000
- Word processors and semantic content
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 12 Feb 2008 00:13:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 11 Feb 2008 23:52:06 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Daniel L. Koger" <daniel.koger@gmail.com> on 11 Feb 2008 23:51:34 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 23:03:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:53:50 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:50:27 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:42:49 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 22:38:05 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 11 Feb 2008 22:10:36 -0000
- ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 11 Feb 2008 21:38:32 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 20:36:52 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Feb 2008 20:22:19 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 18:52:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 11 Feb 2008 18:46:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 11 Feb 2008 18:09:32 -0000
- [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 11 Feb 2008 17:52:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 11 Feb 2008 17:46:46 -0000
- RE: Word processors and semantic content
- From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 11 Feb 2008 17:41:44 -0000
- LinkedData Planet call for speakers closes February 15, 2008
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 11 Feb 2008 17:33:44 -0000
- [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 11 Feb 2008 17:09:48 -0000
- XPath(ish) in the browser
- From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 11 Feb 2008 14:52:54 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery [offtopic]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 11 Feb 2008 12:54:16 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 11 Feb 2008 12:54:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 11 Feb 2008 12:52:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 11 Feb 2008 11:45:10 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath search problem
- From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@xopus.com> on 11 Feb 2008 09:57:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath search problem
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 11 Feb 2008 09:53:24 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main]
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Feb 2008 09:26:46 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Feb 2008 09:14:31 -0000
- XPath search problem
- From "Marshall, Steven (SKM)" <SMarshall@skm.com.au> on 11 Feb 2008 08:46:56 -0000
- Re: SQL instead of XQuery [main]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 11 Feb 2008 07:45:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 11 Feb 2008 06:52:39 -0000
- Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 11 Feb 2008 06:04:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation- A XPath/XQuery Challenge
- From mike@adatinc.com on 10 Feb 2008 23:00:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots
- From "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@gmail.com> on 10 Feb 2008 18:03:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 10 Feb 2008 15:34:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents bySearchbots
- From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 10 Feb 2008 15:19:21 -0000
- Experiment on the Indexibility of XML Documents by Searchbots
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 10 Feb 2008 14:59:05 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Feb 2008 00:27:54 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Feb 2008 23:58:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> on 8 Feb 2008 22:35:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 8 Feb 2008 21:15:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From mike@adatinc.com on 8 Feb 2008 20:46:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com> on 8 Feb 2008 20:32:18 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Feb 2008 19:36:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 8 Feb 2008 19:02:26 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Xia Li" <xli@galdosinc.com> on 8 Feb 2008 18:53:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com> on 8 Feb 2008 17:59:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2008 16:22:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2008 14:22:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 8 Feb 2008 13:20:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 8 Feb 2008 13:11:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 8 Feb 2008 13:07:28 -0000
- Word processors and semantic content
- From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@xopus.com> on 8 Feb 2008 12:48:28 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Feb 2008 10:09:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From mike@adatinc.com on 8 Feb 2008 02:38:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2008 01:32:34 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Xia Li" <xli@galdosinc.com> on 8 Feb 2008 01:14:52 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Feb 2008 00:38:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From mike@adatinc.com on 7 Feb 2008 23:39:37 -0000
- Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery
- From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@chaeron.com> on 7 Feb 2008 22:54:47 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Feb 2008 22:54:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML databaseprocessing
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 7 Feb 2008 21:42:51 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 7 Feb 2008 18:55:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From mike@adatinc.com on 7 Feb 2008 18:49:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0
- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 7 Feb 2008 18:40:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation
- From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 7 Feb 2008 16:02:52 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Feb 2008 15:12:19 -0000
- [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 3.1.0 released
- From Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> on 7 Feb 2008 14:08:16 -0000
- Applying enumeration-facet on list type
- From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F5.com> on 7 Feb 2008 12:54:30 -0000
- Timezone ambiguities in date built-in type
- From "Eran Balter" <E.Balter@F5.com> on 7 Feb 2008 12:19:14 -0000
- [main] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 7 Feb 2008 10:12:57 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Feb 2008 09:56:23 -0000
- [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 7 Feb 2008 09:38:35 -0000
- [personal]
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 7 Feb 2008 09:12:33 -0000
- [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 7 Feb 2008 08:43:37 -0000
- [distribution] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 7 Feb 2008 08:43:16 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards
- From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 7 Feb 2008 07:50:01 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility- XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron
- From Zhiwu Xie <zxie.lists@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2008 01:56:27 -0000
- XPath 2.0 and XQuery Quick Reference Cards
- From Dan Vint <dvint@dvint.com> on 7 Feb 2008 01:36:51 -0000
- [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 7 Feb 2008 00:19:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 6 Feb 2008 23:54:00 -0000
- Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron
- From "Zhiwu Xie" <zxie.lists@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2008 21:48:37 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Feb 2008 13:47:34 -0000
- Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:55:28 -0000
- Re[2]: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:57 -0000
- Re[2]: SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:47 -0000
- Re: [offtopic] Re: SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:47 -0000
- Re[2]: [offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:46 -0000
- Re: [offtopic] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:45 -0000
- Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:39 -0000
- Re[2]: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:36 -0000
- Re: [distribution] SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 6 Feb 2008 12:46:34 -0000
- Call for Papers: XIME-P 2008
- From Carl-Christian Kanne <cckanne@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2008 11:55:50 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SQL instead of XQuery
- From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 6 Feb 2008 08:32:07 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2008 23:46:54 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element)
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2008 22:18:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(not a global element)
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 5 Feb 2008 22:08:13 -0000
- The limitations of XPath and navigation for XML database processing
- From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 5 Feb 2008 21:46:29 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:56:29 -0000
- re[xml-dev] ferencing an already declared element in the schema(nota global element)
- From XGuy <ilangocal@yahoo.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:44:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?
- From XGuy <ilangocal@yahoo.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:32:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:24:39 -0000
- [ANN] Metalink (XML for describing downloads: mirrors, checksums, etc)
- From "Anthony Bryan" <anthonybryan@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:17:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 5 Feb 2008 20:04:11 -0000
- Re: SQL instead of XQuery
- From "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@chaeron.com> on 5 Feb 2008 19:19:12 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?
- From XGuy <ilangocal@yahoo.com> on 5 Feb 2008 19:09:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2008 18:24:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?
- From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 5 Feb 2008 18:22:59 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?
- From XGuy <ilangocal@yahoo.com> on 5 Feb 2008 18:22:35 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside another complexType?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2008 18:08:48 -0000
- [xml-dev] xs:complexType node element invalid inside anothercomplexType?
- From XGuy <ilangocal@yahoo.com> on 5 Feb 2008 17:30:35 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2008 12:05:17 -0000
- SQL instead of XQuery
- From Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru> on 5 Feb 2008 09:32:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From Nicholas.Ardlie@immi.gov.au on 5 Feb 2008 05:03:04 -0000
- Schema compile/validate problems in .NET 2.0
- From "Marshall, Steven (SKM)" <SMarshall@skm.com.au> on 5 Feb 2008 04:39:22 -0000
- Press Release - CECID Contributed OSB Service Bus to CECID CommunityWebsite
- From Patrick Yee <kcyee@cecid.hku.hk> on 5 Feb 2008 03:09:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2008 08:51:13 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 4 Feb 2008 07:54:00 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2008 04:30:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 4 Feb 2008 04:17:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2008 03:58:06 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2008 17:23:01 -0000
- [ann: debugxslt v.0.1]: a very experimental xslt lint checker using latest schematron
- From "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2008 16:48:36 -0000
- [OT] bugs in JDK regex engine ?
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2008 16:33:25 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 1 Feb 2008 18:42:24 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] can MSV accept more than one schema files at once
- From Zhenyu Dai <zhedai@exchange.microsoft.com> on 1 Feb 2008 18:21:38 -0000
- EditiX XML Editor - 2008 RC1
- From "Alexandre Brillant" <abrillant@japisoft.com> on 1 Feb 2008 18:19:07 -0000
- RE:[SUMMARY] [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 Best Practice Issue: Graceful Degradation
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Feb 2008 16:51:21 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 1 Feb 2008 15:31:01 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 1 Feb 2008 15:26:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2008 15:24:21 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Leendert Poot <lpoot@csc.com> on 1 Feb 2008 15:14:00 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 1 Feb 2008 15:07:49 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 1 Feb 2008 14:49:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation
- From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 1 Feb 2008 14:43:44 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 1 Feb 2008 14:11:42 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Are documents loosing the web?
- From Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com> on 1 Feb 2008 14:00:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Benefits of validation
- From "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2008 12:45:43 -0000
- Benefits of validation
- From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 1 Feb 2008 11:20:49 -0000
- Are documents loosing the web?
- From Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> on 1 Feb 2008 08:51:52 -0000
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.0b2
