[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:47:25 -0800
Michael Kay wrote:
> But of course other people may have subtly different requirements. And it
> looks as if that JSON may be one of those slippery specs (like CSV?) that
> means whatever you want it to mean. Shame, I thought we'd got past that
> phase of evolution.
>
That seems to be endemic to any spec written by a single person.
Remember XML-RPC? RSS 0.9.x?
Standards body processes can be ugly, annoying, political, and slow but
they do tend to weed out a much greater percentage of the serious
mistakes and ambiguities.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
- References:
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@uai.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]