Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?

[Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>]

Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Elliotte Harold writes:
> 
>> . . . then this should be
>> addressed in a new version of XML rather than by abusing the W3C
>> errata process.
> 
> The W3C errata process [1] defines three kinds of change which can be
> published in a new edition:
>  3) Corrections that MAY affect conformance, but add no new features
>     These changes MAY affect conformance to the Recommendation.
> ...
> Seems to me the proposed name-character inventory change falls
> squarely in category 3. 


Seem to me it's clearly a new feature: several thousand of them in fact.

--
Elliotte Harold