[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Namespace: CSS in addition to prefix (was: CSS instead of Namespace)
- From: Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:59:50 +0200
Robert,
XML itself is only data, without any behaviour or presentation.
Namespace exists to specify behaviour (XInclude) or possible
behaviour (XLink), traditionaly identified with presentation
(with <a href>).
And single destination of personal namespace (not interpreting by
User Agent) is only to prevent distribution of standardized namespaces
(e.g. XInclude, XLink) to your personal XML-elements.
Are you agree with this primary position ?
P.S.
Certainly, i'm sure, that
'http://www.w3.org/2001/' is redundant in
'xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/2001/xinclude', and
'xmlns:x="xinclude' is enough; as well as
'http://www.w3.org/1999' is redundant in
'xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink', and
'xmlns:x="xlink' is enough;
>> RK> What happens when the same name appears in two different namespaces?
The same, independently where name is specified: in prefix or in
separate file.
Of course, i count this question quite artificial:
if user chose one name for two and much namespaces, he make mistake;
if one name with different namespace definitions is in different
XML-files, then applying of name is limited by border of file.
Dmitry Turin
HTML6 (6. 5.4) http://html60.euro.ru
SQL5 (5.11.3) http://sql50.euro.ru
Unicode7 (7. 2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2. 0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]