XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
[offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery

Chris,

>> As well, as XQuery is foreign query languge for rational databases.
CB> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/rational
CB> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/relational

I have read. I will not guess your thought,
say directly, what are you wanting to say.

P.S. If you wanted to say, that opposite opinion exists,
this existance is not disclaimer.

CB> store all your data [xml and rational] in one engine
CB> you should be storing all your data [xml and rational] in an XML database.
+
CB> Don't try to pretend that XML ...
CB> can be efficiently represented or processed in the relational
CB> paradigm.

You are against researches and my results,
but earlier you say, that today's way is bad.
You disagree to yourself.

>> CB> ... [to] object databases
>> What is alternative instead of SQL99
>> (http://www.wiscorp.com/sql1999_c3.zip ) ?
CB> SQL99 is a language for relational databases not object databases.

Ortodox.

CB> Languages for object databases include OQL and OCL

Languages are equal only before god and linguist :)
Let's return to usability, habits, i.e. to real life.



Dmitry Turin
HTML6     (6. 5.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
SQL5      (5.11.0)  http://sql50.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7. 2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2. 0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS