[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
[offtopic] SQL instead of XQuery
- From: Dmitry Turin <dev3os@narod.ru>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:43:18 +0200
Chris,
>> As well, as XQuery is foreign query languge for rational databases.
CB> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/rational
CB> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/relational
I have read. I will not guess your thought,
say directly, what are you wanting to say.
P.S. If you wanted to say, that opposite opinion exists,
this existance is not disclaimer.
CB> store all your data [xml and rational] in one engine
CB> you should be storing all your data [xml and rational] in an XML database.
+
CB> Don't try to pretend that XML ...
CB> can be efficiently represented or processed in the relational
CB> paradigm.
You are against researches and my results,
but earlier you say, that today's way is bad.
You disagree to yourself.
>> CB> ... [to] object databases
>> What is alternative instead of SQL99
>> (http://www.wiscorp.com/sql1999_c3.zip ) ?
CB> SQL99 is a language for relational databases not object databases.
Ortodox.
CB> Languages for object databases include OQL and OCL
Languages are equal only before god and linguist :)
Let's return to usability, habits, i.e. to real life.
Dmitry Turin
HTML6 (6. 5.3) http://html60.euro.ru
SQL5 (5.11.0) http://sql50.euro.ru
Unicode7 (7. 2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2. 0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]