XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?

Thanks Mike, for useful suggestions ... It helps me ...

On Feb 19, 2008 4:22 AM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> > I need a 1-to-1 mapping between file system directory/file
> > names and XML names. I am generating a meta data (the XML
> > output) to be used by another tool (which physically
> > sees/processes the directories/files and consults the XML
> > meta data for some processing).
>
> You don't need it, you want it.
>
> Generally it's best if element and attribute names are names of types, not
> of instances. If you've got 23 files in a directory you want to represent
> that with 23 <file> elements containing different data, not with 23 elements
> having different element names. The limitations on choice of characters in
> element names are only one of the reasons for preferring this design.
>
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS