Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com>]

It seems like the last week all discussion has centered around XML
1.05, XML 2.0, and time for a new edition of XML (leaving out trolling
discussions)

I'm not sure what to make of this, does it imply that the time has
come! or does it imply (as might be implied by decreasing graphs of
XML-DEV usage over the years) that XML-DEV has nothing left to say.

I guess I believe in the former.


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Peter Hunsberger
<peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> wrote:
>  > Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>  <snip/>
>
>
>  >  Number 7 does it for me!
>  >
>  >  7.  XML 2.0 shall do away with the requirement that documents can have
>  >  only a single root element.
>
>  <snip/>
>
>
>  >  Now that could make for fun and a shared win for docheads and dataheads!
>
>  Man, wouldn't it though.  Almost worth a 2.0 just for that feature
>  alone, throwing out DTDs while you're at it seems to make it a no
>  brainer!
>
>  --
>  Peter Hunsberger
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________________________________
>
>  XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
>  to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
>  spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
>  [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
>  Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
>  subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
>  List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>  List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>