XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] ten years later, time to repeat it?

>
>  My problem with the subset idea is simply what this thread usually produces:
>  it's tough to get buy in on what to leave in or leave out.   IME, DTDs are
>  more likely to be understood by non-XML-Dev developers than XSD, yet it is
>  always top of the death list.

Understood implies correct usage. This might be so just because so
many of the early books focus on DTDs, as for XML Schema I suppose a
subset of XML Schema could be understood just as easily as a DTD, but
unfortunately there isn't a subsetted spec.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS