XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?

On 22/02/2008, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> >
>  > Not in our lifetime or XML's, possibly not in humanity's. It
>  > took humanity thousands of years to invent the ~100,000
>  > characters in Unicode today. It will take at least thousands
>  > more to invent the next 900,000.
>  >
>  Music notation is now in Unicode, but in very incomplete form. How many
>  characters would be added if one tried to do dance notation?
>
>  And I wonder how many corporate logos there are in everyday use, and when we
>  will see the first one added to Unicode?


Out of interest - what is the standard approach for displaying some
XML that contains a real mix Unicode characters?

I remember working for one place where they didn't want to / couldn't
pay the licensing for Arial Unicode MS and I had to mark up non Arial
characters to use a different font.

I hope that's not a dumb question... I remember thinking at the time
it was a poor "solution".  I seem to recall something about a future
CSS version handling it?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS