[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Nested Documents (was: XML 2.0)
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Johnson, Matthew C. \(LNG-ALB\)'" <Matthew.C.Johnson@lexisnexis.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:28:35 -0000
> I like the idea of the
> processing instruction. Although it seems that it should be
> a standardized one (e.g. <?xml:docclosed ...?>) that all
> parsers can look for.
I'm afraid I find this all completely bizarre. I thought the days when you
put "****" at the end of a data file because you couldn't rely on the I/O
system reporting that you'd hit the end of your reel of paper tape were gone
about 40 years ago.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]