[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
[xml-dev] XML Grammar [EBNF]
- From: "netbeans.javame.user" <netbeans.javame.user@gmail.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Hello.
I was browsing at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ Extensible Markup Language
(XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition) and I noticed the production rule; "[1]
document ::= prolog element Misc*" the document states that
"Matching the document production implies that:
1.It contains one or more elements."
Well, I can't determinate this by looking at the above production. Only
after, digging deeper into the non-terminal symbol element does the above
statement becomes evident but not by just looking at the production given by
rule [1]. Why not be precise and say something like "By following the
production rule for non-terminal element a matching document must contain
one or more elements".
Any comments on this anyone?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XML-Grammar--EBNF--tp15562522p15562522.html
Sent from the Xml.org Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]