XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?

On Feb 16, 2008, at 18:30, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Dave Pawson wrote:
>> Elliotte. You mutter about Unicode changes/stability, just how
>> stable is this set of entities?
>
> Reasonably. We'd just need to agree that we won't have every entity  
> everybody needs; just a reasonable set that a lot of people need.

And how do you get to pick those? There are a lot of people who  
speak, say, Mandarin who might not have a computer right now but will  
in a couple years' time. Do we ask them what they want or do we just  
go ahead with the (for the most part, blatantly useless) set of  
é and friends.

Maybe we should have a Rich White Men Consortium that would make  
"reasonable" specification?

--
Robin Berjon
........................................................................
"In the beginning the universe was created. This has been widely
  criticised and generally regarded as a bad move."
                         -- Douglas Adams




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS