[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard
- From: "Len" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:25:54 -0500
Hard to answer. I think it is easy to say it is a best practice given
recommendations by the W3C. Convention may be a weaker form of a behavior
of adoption with best practice the next stronger form and standard being the
strongest form. Finding a reliable discriminator for the test is the prize
here.
Is camel case a convention until it is a requirement?
Convention suggests informal adoption. That may or may not be grassroots
because I'm never quite sure what that means these days either.
len
From: Costello, Roger L. [mailto:costello@mitre.org]
> A convention or best practice would be putting a namespace
> dictionary or document at the location indicated by the namespace
URI.
Ah, that's a good one Len!
> A convention or best practice
Is a convention the same thing as a best practice?
/Roger
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]