[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Convention versus standard
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@mitre.org>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:33:23 +0100
>
> What conventions have formed in the XML community? Are there
> any conventions that have become universally accepted? Are
> there conventions that have been adopted only within a community?
There are zillions of such conventions.
We notice them when people don't follow them:
- bad indenting
- using unconventional namespace prefixes
- putting attributes in a namespace without good justification
- encoding information into element names that should be in attributes
- using mixed content for data when the content is meaningless without the
tags
- using meaningless element names
- attaching meaning to things that should be irrelevant, like comments or
CDATA delimiters
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]