[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
R: Re: [xml-dev] Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
- From: "fmeschini@tin.it" <fmeschini@tin.it>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:31 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
>The XML specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/
starts with,
>Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML, describes
...
>So the spec says, it's an abbreviation ...
Probably because
'acronymied' is a little bit of a cacophony, and to write 'abbreviated
through the acronym' was too complex of a sentence.
Technically XML is
an acronym, as GNU, SQL, FAT, BBC or TARDIS are. Probably we should
discuss whehter an 'acronym' is a subtype of the more general
'abbreviation' type which is at the same time disjointed from the
'contraction' subtype (e.g. Dr. for Doctor).
Fede
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]