Re: [xml-dev] R: Re: [xml-dev] Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?

[Steve Bjorg <steveb@mindtouch.com>]

As pointed out by others, XML is an abbreviation.  The sheer fact that  
it contains no vowels should make it clear that it's unpronounceable  
as an acronym.

- Steve

--------------
Steve G. Bjorg
http://wiki.mindtouch.com
http://twitter.com/bjorg

On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:23 AM, fmeschini@tin.it wrote:

>> The XML specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/
> starts with,
>> Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML, describes
> ...
>> So the spec says, it's an abbreviation ...
>
> Probably because
> 'acronymied' is a little bit of a cacophony, and to write 'abbreviated
> through the acronym' was too complex of a sentence.
>
> Technically XML is
> an acronym, as GNU, SQL, FAT, BBC or TARDIS are. Probably we should
> discuss whehter an 'acronym' is a subtype of the more general
> 'abbreviation' type which is at the same time disjointed from the
> 'contraction' subtype (e.g. Dr. for Doctor).
>
> Fede
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>