XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath datamodel, or DOM

Philippe Poulard a écrit :
> Mukul Gandhi a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>    I wrote the following blog post. This is perhaps a weird thought,
>> for people having worked with XML for long.
>>
>> http://mukulgandhi.blogspot.com/2008/09/should-we-include-version10-in-xpath.html 
>>
>>
>> This is a short description of the points I have in mind.
>>
>> Could you please let us know, if my logic have any merit.
>>
> 
> Perhaps exposed as attributes ?
> 
> /@version
> /@standalone
> /@encoding
> 
> This would have the advantage to keep as-is the XML syntax

Error: I was talking about the XPath syntax, of course :)

The 3 expressions above are syntaxically correct

-- 
Cordialement,

               ///
              (. .)
  --------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
  -----------------------------
  http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
        Have the RefleX !


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS