[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Type substitution vs. element substitution (akasubstitution groups)
- From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:39:41 -0500
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Is there a suggested best practice to choose between type substitution
> and element substitution for XML schemas that wish to support
> extension via inheritance? Please share your opinions and experience
> as well as any resources on the subject. Thank you.
>
Here are some resources I have found:
Against xsi:type:
<http://blog.whatfettle.com/2006/11/29/xsitype-is-evil/>
<http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/29/trainwreck>
Against element substitution:
<http://www.kohsuke.org/xmlschema/XMLSchemaDOsAndDONTs.html>
Neutral or leaning towards xsi:type:
<http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.pdf>
I am surprised that this question got only 1 response (thanks Boris).
Can we please get some more input and experience sharing on this.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]