XML.orgXML.org
FOCUS AREAS |XML-DEV |XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK |REGISTRY |RESOURCES |ABOUT
OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Cox, Bruce <Bruce.Cox@uspto.gov> wrote:
> I won't comment on the success or failure of RDF, but it seems to me
> that it's highly abstract, not necessarily highly generic.

Ok, I'll bite.  What's the difference?  (Seriously...)

> What is a generic vocabulary?  One that serves too many masters?  Poorly
> focused?  Become confused in the minds of consumers as referring to a
> whole class of (vocabularies | schemas) rather than just the one?
>
> Bruce B Cox
-- 
Peter Hunsberger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS