xml-dev

161 messages in this archive (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index

• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 1 Mar 2009 02:48:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] "vocabulary constraints" and other constraints (was:Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?)
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 28 Feb 2009 02:53:17 -0000
• "vocabulary constraints" and other constraints (was: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?)
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org> on 28 Feb 2009 02:35:32 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From John Kemp <john.kemp@nokia.com> on 27 Feb 2009 20:54:42 -0000
• XDR to XSD converter?
  • From "Karol Zielonko" <karol.zielonko@gmail.com> on 27 Feb 2009 03:48:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From Michael Hahn <sgml.xml@cox.net> on 27 Feb 2009 03:09:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From "Len" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 26 Feb 2009 23:51:40 -0000
• [Ann] SketchPath Tool - Now available as Word2007 Addin
  • From Philip Fearon <pgfearo@googlemail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 22:12:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 19:15:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From Don Demsak <donxml@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 19:11:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 26 Feb 2009 18:20:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com> on 26 Feb 2009 17:40:27 -0000
• [ann] oXygen XML Editor 10.1 - new XML Schema diagram and documentation
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 26 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From csi2000@urbanmarket.com on 26 Feb 2009 15:40:25 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From "Liz Andrews" <liz.andrews@altova.com> on 26 Feb 2009 15:10:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Twitterers
  • From Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@hotmail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 13:44:08 -0000
• Twitterers
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> on 26 Feb 2009 13:18:42 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2009 09:11:01 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Feb 2009 09:03:45 -0000
• Calls for Participation -- Balisage & Processing XML Symposium
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 26 Feb 2009 02:20:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 26 Feb 2009 01:40:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 26 Feb 2009 00:28:46 -0000
• RE: Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 26 Feb 2009 00:03:40 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From "Ken North" <kennorth@sbcglobal.net> on 25 Feb 2009 20:12:04 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 25 Feb 2009 15:40:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 25 Feb 2009 13:17:05 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 25 Feb 2009 12:18:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From Chris Burdess <dog@bluezoo.org> on 25 Feb 2009 11:46:39 -0000
• Difference between "normalize" and "canonicalize"?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 25 Feb 2009 11:38:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Remove Nodes But Keep Children
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2009 11:17:00 -0000
• [Summary] 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of eachapproach
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Feb 2009 13:37:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Remove Nodes But Keep Children
  • From David <david@semlabs.co.uk> on 22 Feb 2009 00:45:23 -0000
• Remove Nodes But Keep Children
  • From David <david@semlabs.co.uk> on 22 Feb 2009 00:38:09 -0000
• ANN: XProc Tutorial
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 21 Feb 2009 13:39:40 -0000
• RE: Identifying markup using namespaces versus using data (was:4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach)
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 20 Feb 2009 19:21:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 20 Feb 2009 17:14:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Feb 2009 16:52:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From Santhosh T <santhosh.tekuri@gmail.com> on 20 Feb 2009 16:44:04 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@sophia.inria.fr> on 20 Feb 2009 16:25:20 -0000
• Re: Hello,Kseniya here.
  • From liam mail <liam.list@googlemail.com> on 20 Feb 2009 15:23:53 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Feb 2009 14:15:11 -0000
• [ANN] XML Prague 2009 March 21-22, only one month to go ... register now
  • From Jim Fuller <jim.fuller@xmlprague.cz> on 20 Feb 2009 08:54:37 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysisof each approach
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 19 Feb 2009 22:02:52 -0000
• Identifying markup using namespaces versus using data (was: 4approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach)
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Feb 2009 19:27:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From Santhosh T <santhosh.tekuri@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 19:17:34 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Feb 2009 18:35:56 -0000
• There's still time to sign up for the next tools neutral free webinar
  • From "Sharon Burton" <sburton@madcapsoftware.com> on 19 Feb 2009 17:32:53 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Feb 2009 16:58:54 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From norias70482@mypacks.net on 19 Feb 2009 16:39:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From norias70482@mypacks.net on 19 Feb 2009 16:34:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Feb 2009 16:04:45 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 19 Feb 2009 16:03:32 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 19 Feb 2009 15:52:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysisof each approach
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 19 Feb 2009 15:50:31 -0000
• RE: 4 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of eachapproach
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Feb 2009 15:12:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file
  • From liam mail <liam.list@googlemail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 12:50:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 05:41:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From Piotr Bański <bansp@o2.pl> on 19 Feb 2009 02:23:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 01:33:41 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 19 Feb 2009 01:33:04 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife ora dedicated appliance?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 19 Feb 2009 01:29:46 -0000
• I have implemented SAX based XPath Engine
  • From Santhosh T <santhosh.tekuri@gmail.com> on 19 Feb 2009 01:07:05 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysisof each approach
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 19 Feb 2009 00:47:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife ora dedicated appliance?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 19 Feb 2009 00:37:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2009 23:46:49 -0000
• ANNOUNCE: MarkLogic User Conference 2009
  • From Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com> on 18 Feb 2009 23:34:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From Daniel Grossberg <danielgr@itis.com> on 18 Feb 2009 23:08:53 -0000
• XML Conferences in 2009?
  • From norias70482@mypacks.net on 18 Feb 2009 22:17:48 -0000
• Using xsd:list and getting data from xml file
  • From liam mail <liam.list@googlemail.com> on 18 Feb 2009 18:34:58 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance?
  • From "Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com> on 17 Feb 2009 20:37:52 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or adedicated appliance?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Feb 2009 13:11:37 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 17 Feb 2009 12:51:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 17 Feb 2009 00:19:08 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Feb 2009 23:53:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicated appliance?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 16 Feb 2009 23:30:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or adedicated appliance?
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 16 Feb 2009 22:16:40 -0000
• Should an XML vocabulary be a Swiss Army Knife or a dedicatedappliance?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Feb 2009 21:40:02 -0000
• Email about the apartment
  • From 0128@brnapartments.com on 16 Feb 2009 18:59:59 -0000
• python and xacml
  • From Oguz Yarimtepe <comp.ogz@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 18:59:47 -0000
• [Announce] Expanded syllabus now includes XQuery in March European training at XML Prague
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 16 Feb 2009 13:46:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 15 Feb 2009 15:47:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 15 Feb 2009 14:21:12 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis ofeach approach
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Feb 2009 12:58:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 14 Feb 2009 23:22:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 14 Feb 2009 23:18:49 -0000
• xmllint
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 14 Feb 2009 23:11:40 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Feb 2009 23:04:26 -0000
• 3 approaches to structure lists, plus an analysis of each approach
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 14 Feb 2009 22:40:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Schema fragments form style sheets?
  • From Christian Mahnke <cmahnke.sub@googlemail.com> on 12 Feb 2009 13:22:27 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Schema fragments form style sheets?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Feb 2009 09:59:17 -0000
• Schema fragments form style sheets?
  • From Christian Mahnke <cmahnke.sub@googlemail.com> on 12 Feb 2009 09:48:32 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 11 Feb 2009 22:06:58 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 11 Feb 2009 11:27:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries?
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 11 Feb 2009 10:54:06 -0000
• DOM level 1 java parsers?
  • From Keith Hassen <keith.hassen@gmail.com> on 10 Feb 2009 22:16:47 -0000
• [xml-dev] XML representation of SQL queries?
  • From "ken_north@compuserve.com" <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 9 Feb 2009 23:58:58 -0000
• XML representation of SQL queries?
  • From Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> on 9 Feb 2009 16:04:03 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type?
  • From "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca> on 9 Feb 2009 15:50:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 9 Feb 2009 15:37:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Feb 2009 15:25:19 -0000
• A bad idea to use the XML Schema list type?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Feb 2009 15:10:44 -0000
• keyword search over XML streams
  • From Maciej Gawinecki <mgawinecki@gmail.com> on 9 Feb 2009 14:43:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Feb 2009 10:35:31 -0000
• XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 9 Feb 2009 10:17:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL2.0 stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 6 Feb 2009 13:46:19 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Feb 2009 09:21:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 6 Feb 2009 03:02:28 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2009 22:23:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 5 Feb 2009 19:23:18 -0000
• [ANN] Xml Schema Lightener 2.0 utility: making schemas simpler
  • From "Paul Kiel" <paul@xmlhelpline.com> on 5 Feb 2009 15:09:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Feb 2009 15:07:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 5 Feb 2009 12:29:49 -0000
• [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD/e 3.0.0 released
  • From Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> on 5 Feb 2009 07:56:30 -0000
• ANN: Altova MissionKit v2009
  • From "Liz Andrews" <liz.andrews@altova.com> on 4 Feb 2009 16:05:19 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 4 Feb 2009 13:26:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 4 Feb 2009 12:53:27 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies forWorkflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 4 Feb 2009 12:50:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 4 Feb 2009 10:10:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 4 Feb 2009 10:00:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 4 Feb 2009 09:06:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies forWorkflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au> on 4 Feb 2009 00:11:31 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 23:55:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies forWorkflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au> on 3 Feb 2009 23:33:38 -0000
• any-to-any structure transformations article
  • From mike@adatinc.com on 3 Feb 2009 19:05:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2009 17:55:17 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 15:57:23 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 3 Feb 2009 15:49:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 14:39:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] SAX - not well formed data
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 3 Feb 2009 14:35:11 -0000
• SAX - not well formed data
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 3 Feb 2009 14:02:18 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] SAX
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 14:01:19 -0000
• SAX
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 3 Feb 2009 13:50:56 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:41:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 3 Feb 2009 13:13:07 -0000
• RE: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 3 Feb 2009 08:41:56 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 3 Feb 2009 01:04:38 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 3 Feb 2009 00:05:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Purpose of XML (was: irrelevant title)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:56:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:40:23 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:39:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:39:39 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Alan CANNON <acannon@plasticomnium.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:37:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2009 21:27:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:24:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Alan CANNON <acannon@plasticomnium.com> on 2 Feb 2009 21:10:50 -0000
• XSTL stylesheet workarounds for exceptions
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 2 Feb 2009 21:03:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Keith Hassen <keith.hassen@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 20:55:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 20:43:22 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 2 Feb 2009 20:07:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2009 18:14:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarative programming languages
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 17:54:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 17:13:21 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 2 Feb 2009 15:54:40 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarativeprogramming languages
  • From Jonas Mellin <jonas.mellin@his.se> on 2 Feb 2009 14:31:50 -0000
• The beauty and power of declarative syntaxes and declarativeprogramming languages
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 2 Feb 2009 13:26:54 -0000
• Schematron XQuery binding
  • From bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 11:32:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev-list@boynings.co.uk> on 2 Feb 2009 11:05:51 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Feb 2009 09:46:35 -0000
• Re: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au> on 1 Feb 2009 23:59:02 -0000
• RE: Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for WorkflowApplications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 1 Feb 2009 18:35:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for Workflow Applications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@googlemail.com> on 1 Feb 2009 12:53:18 -0000