[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
- From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: "'Michael Ludwig'" <milu71@gmx.de>,"'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:38:25 +0100
>
> The one truly horrible thing about namespaces is the horrible
> convention adopted of making them way too complicated for the
> eyeball to parse easily with no obvious benefit at all. (And
> not even hidden benefits, I think.)
I agree that's one of the problems, and fixing it would actually require no
change to the specs, just a change in working practices. (I think this
philosophy of "every identifier must be a URI", coupled with "URIs should
begin with 'http://', is one of the worst things to come out of W3C). But
there are plenty of other problems, notably the impact of namespace
declarations on the data model (in-scope prefix bindings need to be retained
in the data model just in case anyone happens to be using prefixes in
element or attribute content.)
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]