xml-dev

158 messages in this archive (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index

• Pragmatic namespaces
  • From Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com> on 31 Jul 2009 23:06:52 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML
  • From Liam Quin <liam@w3.org> on 29 Jul 2009 15:01:57 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned?
  • From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 29 Jul 2009 11:05:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 29 Jul 2009 10:46:29 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Jul 2009 10:45:07 -0000
• XPointer string functions -- abandoned?
  • From Piotr Bański <bansp@o2.pl> on 29 Jul 2009 10:33:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML
  • From Ken Starks <ken@lampsacos.demon.co.uk> on 29 Jul 2009 07:41:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Jul 2009 07:30:05 -0000
• Wikipedia on XML
  • From Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM> on 29 Jul 2009 03:38:48 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial
  • From Ken Starks <ken@lampsacos.demon.co.uk> on 27 Jul 2009 18:21:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Evan Lenz <evan@evanlenz.net> on 26 Jul 2009 07:16:28 -0000
• ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Jul 2009 19:30:22 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 24 Jul 2009 18:01:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Evan Lenz <evan@evanlenz.net> on 24 Jul 2009 16:29:09 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Chuck Bearden <cbearden@rice.edu> on 24 Jul 2009 15:24:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 24 Jul 2009 09:07:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Evan Lenz <evan@evanlenz.net> on 24 Jul 2009 05:25:09 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 23 Jul 2009 21:20:07 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] DTD 2 Schema
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 23 Jul 2009 18:39:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] DTD 2 Schema
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 23 Jul 2009 18:34:36 -0000
• DTD 2 Schema
  • From Paul M <pjmaip@yahoo.com> on 23 Jul 2009 18:31:15 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jul 2009 08:49:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 23 Jul 2009 05:23:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Evan Lenz <evan@evanlenz.net> on 22 Jul 2009 21:15:13 -0000
• Early Bird Registration ends 31st July - 5th i-Semantics 2009/4th AIS SigPrag Int. Pragmatic Web
  • From "Adrian Paschke" <adrian.paschke@gmx.de> on 22 Jul 2009 18:37:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@marklogic.com> on 20 Jul 2009 01:54:38 -0000
• 3rd International Rules Challenge - Call for Submissions
  • From Yuh-Jong Hu <hu@cs.nccu.edu.tw> on 19 Jul 2009 09:45:04 -0000
• ANN: Updated XProc Tutorial
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 18 Jul 2009 17:51:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Alessandro Vernet <avernet@scdi.org> on 15 Jul 2009 02:04:36 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Jul 2009 19:33:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> on 14 Jul 2009 18:56:34 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 14 Jul 2009 18:12:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> on 14 Jul 2009 17:53:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 14 Jul 2009 17:52:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 14 Jul 2009 17:39:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 14 Jul 2009 17:15:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Jeff Greif <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu> on 14 Jul 2009 17:06:45 -0000
• XHTML 5 - Time to simplify
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 14 Jul 2009 17:00:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 14 Jul 2009 16:58:21 -0000
• XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
  • From Chuck Bearden <cbearden@rice.edu> on 14 Jul 2009 16:38:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Elliotte Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org> on 14 Jul 2009 13:52:26 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com> on 14 Jul 2009 01:26:48 -0000
• Announce: Ant task for Diffing XML Files
  • From Adam Flinton <adam.flinton@nhs.net> on 13 Jul 2009 14:32:25 -0000
• Announce: Ant task for creating instances from XML (W3C) Schema
  • From Adam Flinton <adam.flinton@nhs.net> on 13 Jul 2009 14:29:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 11 Jul 2009 15:46:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 11 Jul 2009 15:20:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 11 Jul 2009 15:08:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 11 Jul 2009 13:58:40 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 11 Jul 2009 12:39:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 11 Jul 2009 10:06:42 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 11 Jul 2009 01:42:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 10 Jul 2009 18:07:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 17:45:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Jul 2009 17:04:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 10 Jul 2009 16:29:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 16:15:55 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Jul 2009 14:08:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 13:14:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 10 Jul 2009 11:34:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 10 Jul 2009 10:27:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 09:20:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 10 Jul 2009 08:27:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 10 Jul 2009 08:25:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Jul 2009 08:23:42 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 08:19:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 06:41:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 10 Jul 2009 05:26:10 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 10 Jul 2009 02:56:49 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 10 Jul 2009 02:23:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 10 Jul 2009 01:18:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 10 Jul 2009 01:14:49 -0000
• RE: Namespace use cases
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 10 Jul 2009 01:00:30 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Len Bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 10 Jul 2009 00:43:07 -0000
• Namespace use cases
  • From Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com> on 10 Jul 2009 00:35:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> on 9 Jul 2009 22:56:04 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 9 Jul 2009 22:55:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 9 Jul 2009 22:32:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 22:04:34 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 9 Jul 2009 21:25:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Time for 4ML?
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 9 Jul 2009 21:23:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 9 Jul 2009 21:20:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 9 Jul 2009 21:06:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
  • From "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> on 9 Jul 2009 20:14:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Aad Kamsteeg <a.kamsteeg@diderottrack.nl> on 9 Jul 2009 15:30:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 9 Jul 2009 15:09:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 14:30:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Dylan Thomas <epwllheli@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 14:28:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Time for 4ML?
  • From Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com> on 9 Jul 2009 13:44:17 -0000
• Time for 4ML?
  • From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 9 Jul 2009 13:30:40 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 9 Jul 2009 13:07:46 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Jul 2009 12:01:22 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 9 Jul 2009 11:36:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 9 Jul 2009 11:33:28 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 9 Jul 2009 10:58:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 10:30:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Jul 2009 10:25:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 10:24:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 9 Jul 2009 10:19:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 9 Jul 2009 09:43:50 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> on 9 Jul 2009 09:41:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 09:31:22 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Jul 2009 08:53:17 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 9 Jul 2009 08:38:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com> on 9 Jul 2009 08:24:04 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 08:15:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 9 Jul 2009 06:23:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 9 Jul 2009 00:17:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 9 Jul 2009 00:00:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de> on 8 Jul 2009 23:14:12 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 22:15:31 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Jul 2009 22:14:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:43:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:30:56 -0000
• Balisage Attendees: Do a Poster!
  • From Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:27:18 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:21:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:17:23 -0000
• Do namespaces address all use cases well
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 8 Jul 2009 21:08:12 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Jul 2009 20:55:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Metalink Download Description Format (XML)
  • From Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 20:11:17 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Jul 2009 19:48:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com> on 8 Jul 2009 19:46:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 19:28:50 -0000
• Metalink Download Description Format (XML)
  • From Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 19:12:51 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com> on 8 Jul 2009 18:52:13 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 8 Jul 2009 17:52:55 -0000
• HTML 5 syntax
  • From Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> on 8 Jul 2009 16:35:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Laurens van den Oever <laurens@xopus.com> on 8 Jul 2009 15:42:05 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Jul 2009 15:02:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 8 Jul 2009 14:54:36 -0000
• svrl:schematron-output - transformation to HTML available?
  • From Michael Ludwig <mlu@as-guides.com> on 8 Jul 2009 12:41:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 8 Jul 2009 10:04:37 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Jul 2009 09:20:06 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 8 Jul 2009 08:54:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 8 Jul 2009 08:23:16 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 8 Jul 2009 04:51:03 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 7 Jul 2009 14:45:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 7 Jul 2009 14:40:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
  • From bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 7 Jul 2009 13:30:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 7 Jul 2009 13:27:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards?
  • From bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 7 Jul 2009 13:19:25 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 7 Jul 2009 12:25:52 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From "Meadows, Philip" <Phil.Meadows@snapon.com> on 7 Jul 2009 12:21:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 7 Jul 2009 12:15:28 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> on 7 Jul 2009 12:06:24 -0000
• XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
  • From Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> on 7 Jul 2009 12:01:31 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 7 Jul 2009 07:50:45 -0000
• DITA in practice
  • From Michael Hahn <sgml.xml@cox.net> on 7 Jul 2009 03:15:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From Anne Thomas Manes <atmanes@gmail.com> on 6 Jul 2009 23:03:46 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 6 Jul 2009 18:37:17 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com> on 6 Jul 2009 16:29:43 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Jul 2009 16:05:27 -0000
• targetNamespace vs default namespace
  • From REV Tamas <tamas.rev@gmail.com> on 6 Jul 2009 15:35:03 -0000
• [ann] oXygen XML Editor 10.3
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 6 Jul 2009 09:00:26 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] generate common xml shema from multiple xml instances
  • From bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 6 Jul 2009 08:13:44 -0000
• What entities do you use for common XML dialects?
  • From bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 6 Jul 2009 07:14:52 -0000
• interesting: xmlvm
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 2 Jul 2009 03:11:12 -0000
• [ANN] Complete Balisage 2009 Program posted
  • From B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com> on 1 Jul 2009 22:50:22 -0000
• XSLT, XQuery, XSL-FO Training in the SF Bay Area
  • From J Miller <millertimerz@sbcglobal.net> on 1 Jul 2009 05:44:34 -0000